OSINT

Why Are Maduro’s Top Lieutenants Still in Charge?

BIAS: Lean Right
RELIABILITY: High

Political Bias Rating

This rating indicates the source’s editorial stance on the political spectrum, based on analysis from Media Bias/Fact Check, AllSides, and Ad Fontes Media.

Far Left / Left: Progressive editorial perspective
Lean Left: Slightly progressive tendency
Center: Balanced, minimal editorial slant
Lean Right: Slightly conservative tendency
Right / Far Right: Conservative editorial perspective

Current source: Lean Right. Stories with cross-spectrum coverage receive elevated prominence.

Reliability Rating

This rating measures the source’s factual accuracy, sourcing quality, and journalistic standards based on third-party fact-checking assessments.

Very High: Exceptional accuracy, rigorous sourcing
High: Strong factual reporting, minor issues rare
Mixed: Generally accurate but occasional concerns
Low: Frequent errors or misleading content
Very Low: Unreliable, significant factual issues

Current source: High. Higher reliability sources receive elevated weighting in story prioritization.

CATO
15:31Z

Ian Vásquez The downfall of Nicolás Maduro rightfully caused celebration among Venezuelans whose hope for an end to tyranny was bolstered by the Trump administration’s announcement that supporting a transition to democracy was part of its mission. , If that is indeed the mission, the U.S. plan to work hand in hand with the remaining regime leaders to stabilize the country for an unspecified period of time is a strategic mistake.

Like the Chavista regime itself, acting Venezuelan president Delcy Rodríguez, minister of the interior Diosdado Cabello, and minister of defense Vladimir Padrino López, have no legitimacy among Venezuelans. Ideologically committed socialists, they’ve played key roles in institutionalizing brutal repression and cannot credibly be counted on to help restore growth or

Continue reading at the original source

Read Full Article at CATO →