OSINT

When Therapy Weakens Instead of Heals

BIAS: Right
RELIABILITY: High

Political Bias Rating

This rating indicates the source’s editorial stance on the political spectrum, based on analysis from Media Bias/Fact Check, AllSides, and Ad Fontes Media.

Far Left / Left: Progressive editorial perspective
Lean Left: Slightly progressive tendency
Center: Balanced, minimal editorial slant
Lean Right: Slightly conservative tendency
Right / Far Right: Conservative editorial perspective

Current source: Right. Stories with cross-spectrum coverage receive elevated prominence.

Reliability Rating

This rating measures the source’s factual accuracy, sourcing quality, and journalistic standards based on third-party fact-checking assessments.

Very High: Exceptional accuracy, rigorous sourcing
High: Strong factual reporting, minor issues rare
Mixed: Generally accurate but occasional concerns
Low: Frequent errors or misleading content
Very Low: Unreliable, significant factual issues

Current source: High. Higher reliability sources receive elevated weighting in story prioritization.

AEI
21:31Z

Public discussion about Gen Z’s rising demand for therapy often swings between two caricatures. One treats therapy as an unqualified good; a universal response to distress. The other dismisses it as a symptom of cultural decline: indulgent, infantilizing, and corrosive.

Both miss the deeper issue. The question is not whether therapy or faith is superior—it is whether our dominant models of care restore adult agency or quietly erode it. That concern is articulated sharply in a recent essay by Mary Rooke, pointedly titled “ Therapy Is an Exercise in Weakness .” Drawing on her own experience, Rooke argues that contemporary therapy often encourages dependency rather than resilience, reframes hardship as permanent injury, and displaces sources of authority once provided by marriage, family, and

Continue reading at the original source

Read Full Article at AEI →