OSINT

What Using AI for My Mom’s Cancer Taught Me

BIAS: Right
RELIABILITY: High

Political Bias Rating

This rating indicates the source’s editorial stance on the political spectrum, based on analysis from Media Bias/Fact Check, AllSides, and Ad Fontes Media.

Far Left / Left: Progressive editorial perspective
Lean Left: Slightly progressive tendency
Center: Balanced, minimal editorial slant
Lean Right: Slightly conservative tendency
Right / Far Right: Conservative editorial perspective

Current source: Right. Stories with cross-spectrum coverage receive elevated prominence.

Reliability Rating

This rating measures the source’s factual accuracy, sourcing quality, and journalistic standards based on third-party fact-checking assessments.

Very High: Exceptional accuracy, rigorous sourcing
High: Strong factual reporting, minor issues rare
Mixed: Generally accurate but occasional concerns
Low: Frequent errors or misleading content
Very Low: Unreliable, significant factual issues

Current source: High. Higher reliability sources receive elevated weighting in story prioritization.

AEI
10:40Z

The most profound way I used AI in 2025 came during one of the harder stretches my family has faced: My mother’s cancer came back. In the past, navigating this diagnosis meant late‑night Googling, scattered notes, and a nagging sense that I did not fully understand the medical language in front of us. Second opinions introduced different treatment options, sequences, and philosophies of care—and a new kind of uncertainty.

Every decision had a life-or-death aspect to it, and most came with trade-offs that had no clear answer. You’re not just picking a treatment. You’re betting.

Betting that the side effects will be worth it. That one option is better than another. That you’re not trading her good days for a few more bad ones.

This time was different. As the diagnosis unfolded, I built a cus

Continue reading at the original source

Read Full Article at AEI →