OSINT

Using an Unmarked Aircraft to Attack an Alleged Drug Boat: Is it Perfidy?

BIAS: Lean Left
RELIABILITY: Very High

Political Bias Rating

This rating indicates the source’s editorial stance on the political spectrum, based on analysis from Media Bias/Fact Check, AllSides, and Ad Fontes Media.

Far Left / Left: Progressive editorial perspective
Lean Left: Slightly progressive tendency
Center: Balanced, minimal editorial slant
Lean Right: Slightly conservative tendency
Right / Far Right: Conservative editorial perspective

Current source: Lean Left. Stories with cross-spectrum coverage receive elevated prominence.

Reliability Rating

This rating measures the source’s factual accuracy, sourcing quality, and journalistic standards based on third-party fact-checking assessments.

Very High: Exceptional accuracy, rigorous sourcing
High: Strong factual reporting, minor issues rare
Mixed: Generally accurate but occasional concerns
Low: Frequent errors or misleading content
Very Low: Unreliable, significant factual issues

Current source: Very High. Higher reliability sources receive elevated weighting in story prioritization.

Just Security
13:52Z

Reports have surfaced that a military aircraft used in the highly controversial Sept. 2, 2025, strike on an alleged drug boat, as well as a follow-on strike as two survivors were clinging to its wreckage, was imitating a civilian aircraft (see here and here ). Reportedly, the aircraft had no military markings and carried weapons internally, but its transponder was “squawking” its military status.

The aircraft apparently swooped in low over the boat, which turned back toward Venezuela, before attacking it and killing nine on board. Two shipwrecked crewmembers and the remains of the boat were then destroyed in a second strike (see analysis of the attacks here and here ). Most discussion of disguising the aircraft’s military character has focused on whether doing so violates the law of armed

Continue reading at the original source

Read Full Article at Just Security →