US’ Global Minimum Tax Carveout Is an Illusion of Sovereignty

BIAS: Lean Right
RELIABILITY: High

Political Bias Rating

This rating indicates the source’s editorial stance on the political spectrum, based on analysis from Media Bias/Fact Check, AllSides, and Ad Fontes Media.

Far Left / Left: Progressive editorial perspective
Lean Left: Slightly progressive tendency
Center: Balanced, minimal editorial slant
Lean Right: Slightly conservative tendency
Right / Far Right: Conservative editorial perspective

Current source: Lean Right. Stories with cross-spectrum coverage receive elevated prominence.

Reliability Rating

This rating measures the source’s factual accuracy, sourcing quality, and journalistic standards based on third-party fact-checking assessments.

Very High: Exceptional accuracy, rigorous sourcing
High: Strong factual reporting, minor issues rare
Mixed: Generally accurate but occasional concerns
Low: Frequent errors or misleading content
Very Low: Unreliable, significant factual issues

Current source: High. Higher reliability sources receive elevated weighting in story prioritization.

CATO
14:35Z

Adam N. Michel Supporters of the OECD’s new Pillar Two “side-by-side” agreement —which carves the US out of the global minimum tax—claim the deal protects US tax sovereignty and preserves Congress’ authority over domestic tax law. , Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called the agreement a victory for US sovereignty, saying it will shield domestic companies from extraterritorial taxation.

That claim deserves closer scrutiny. If the agreement works as intended, it doesn’t preserve congressional sovereignty over domestic tax laws; it constrains it. The agreement’s statutory and effective tax rate safe harbors lock in current tax rules, binding future Congresses to a narrow range of acceptable tax policies—unless they’re willing to expose US firms to the Organization for Economic Cooperation an

Continue reading at the original source

Read Full Article at CATO →