OSINT

The EU Discovers Emergency Powers: Russian Assets Edition

BIAS: Lean Left
RELIABILITY: Very High

Political Bias Rating

This rating indicates the source’s editorial stance on the political spectrum, based on analysis from Media Bias/Fact Check, AllSides, and Ad Fontes Media.

Far Left / Left: Progressive editorial perspective
Lean Left: Slightly progressive tendency
Center: Balanced, minimal editorial slant
Lean Right: Slightly conservative tendency
Right / Far Right: Conservative editorial perspective

Current source: Lean Left. Stories with cross-spectrum coverage receive elevated prominence.

Reliability Rating

This rating measures the source’s factual accuracy, sourcing quality, and journalistic standards based on third-party fact-checking assessments.

Very High: Exceptional accuracy, rigorous sourcing
High: Strong factual reporting, minor issues rare
Mixed: Generally accurate but occasional concerns
Low: Frequent errors or misleading content
Very Low: Unreliable, significant factual issues

Current source: Very High. Higher reliability sources receive elevated weighting in story prioritization.

Just Security
13:28Z

American presidents, and President Donald Trump in particular, have dramatically increased the use of emergency powers in the last few years. They have used emergency powers to pursue aggressive economic sanctions policies, forgive student loan debt, and overhaul U.S. trade policy, among many other things.

It turns out that the U.S. executive branch is not alone in treating emergency powers like bottomless sources of legal authority. The European Union has done this too.

And not unlike in the United States, the more aggressive the EU got in using executive authority, the more political and judicial backlash it faced. The most recent illustration of the EU leaning into emergency powers is its reliance on an emergency provision in the EU treaties, Article 122 of the Treaty on the Functioning

Continue reading at the original source

Read Full Article at Just Security →