Tariffs, Manufacturing, Housing: Questions for 2026

BIAS: Lean Right
RELIABILITY: High

Political Bias Rating

This rating indicates the source’s editorial stance on the political spectrum, based on analysis from Media Bias/Fact Check, AllSides, and Ad Fontes Media.

Far Left / Left: Progressive editorial perspective
Lean Left: Slightly progressive tendency
Center: Balanced, minimal editorial slant
Lean Right: Slightly conservative tendency
Right / Far Right: Conservative editorial perspective

Current source: Lean Right. Stories with cross-spectrum coverage receive elevated prominence.

Reliability Rating

This rating measures the source’s factual accuracy, sourcing quality, and journalistic standards based on third-party fact-checking assessments.

Very High: Exceptional accuracy, rigorous sourcing
High: Strong factual reporting, minor issues rare
Mixed: Generally accurate but occasional concerns
Low: Frequent errors or misleading content
Very Low: Unreliable, significant factual issues

Current source: High. Higher reliability sources receive elevated weighting in story prioritization.

CATO
19:52Z

Scott Lincicome In keeping with Capitolism tradition, my first column of 2026 will examine some of my big, open questions for the coming year—questions that could have significant economic policy implications but don’t yet have solid answers. I think my previous questions from 2023 , 2024 , and 2025 hold up well, so hopefully these will too. (Even if they don’t, they’ll still give you an idea of some of the things I’ll be watching and writing about this year.) , Before we begin, a small programming note: After more than five years of almost-weekly dives into a sea of policy issues, Capitolism will be stepping back a bit in 2026 due to various other work obligations and my intense desire to stay somewhat sane and rested.

Thus, I’ll be writing this newsletter every other week for the foresee

Continue reading at the original source

Read Full Article at CATO →