OSINT

Symposium: Is There a Role for International Courts in Ending Wars?

BIAS: Lean Left
RELIABILITY: Very High

Political Bias Rating

This rating indicates the source’s editorial stance on the political spectrum, based on analysis from Media Bias/Fact Check, AllSides, and Ad Fontes Media.

Far Left / Left: Progressive editorial perspective
Lean Left: Slightly progressive tendency
Center: Balanced, minimal editorial slant
Lean Right: Slightly conservative tendency
Right / Far Right: Conservative editorial perspective

Current source: Lean Left. Stories with cross-spectrum coverage receive elevated prominence.

Reliability Rating

This rating measures the source’s factual accuracy, sourcing quality, and journalistic standards based on third-party fact-checking assessments.

Very High: Exceptional accuracy, rigorous sourcing
High: Strong factual reporting, minor issues rare
Mixed: Generally accurate but occasional concerns
Low: Frequent errors or misleading content
Very Low: Unreliable, significant factual issues

Current source: Very High. Higher reliability sources receive elevated weighting in story prioritization.

Just Security
13:48Z

International courts are increasingly engaged in – or drawn into – ongoing armed conflicts. In our series, Is There a Role for International Courts in Ending Wars? , we bring together diverse scholarly and practitioner perspectives from the End of War Project’s events at Oxford University and the George Washington University Law School in 2024 and 2025. The forthcoming pieces explore the appropriateness and effectiveness of judicial involvement during ongoing armed conflict, the ramifications of such involvement for the courts themselves, the types of measures courts can and should employ, and key considerations for courts when seized of active armed conflict situations.

The Symposium will be updated regularly for the next several weeks; please check back regularly for new articles. Laurie

Continue reading at the original source

Read Full Article at Just Security →