OSINT

Rejecting Climate Policy Is Not a Crime

BIAS: Lean Right
RELIABILITY: High

Political Bias Rating

This rating indicates the source’s editorial stance on the political spectrum, based on analysis from Media Bias/Fact Check, AllSides, and Ad Fontes Media.

Far Left / Left: Progressive editorial perspective
Lean Left: Slightly progressive tendency
Center: Balanced, minimal editorial slant
Lean Right: Slightly conservative tendency
Right / Far Right: Conservative editorial perspective

Current source: Lean Right. Stories with cross-spectrum coverage receive elevated prominence.

Reliability Rating

This rating measures the source’s factual accuracy, sourcing quality, and journalistic standards based on third-party fact-checking assessments.

Very High: Exceptional accuracy, rigorous sourcing
High: Strong factual reporting, minor issues rare
Mixed: Generally accurate but occasional concerns
Low: Frequent errors or misleading content
Very Low: Unreliable, significant factual issues

Current source: High. Higher reliability sources receive elevated weighting in story prioritization.

CATO
15:57Z

Travis Fisher It was bound to happen. Activists are signaling support for the fringe legal theory of “climate homicide,” the notion that certain people and companies should be held criminally responsible for deaths related to climate change. Although it is factually backward and legally dubious, some academics and the shrinking minority of the “climate alarmed” are taking it seriously.

, No one else should, as it would become the latest, gravest threat to human prosperity. Between the Bill Gates memo in October, which elevated human welfare over draconian climate policy, and the lackluster November COP30 meeting in Brazil, climate activists had a tough year in 2025. Months prior, rational environmentalists endorsed economic growth over “net zero,” not because they deny climate change, but

Continue reading at the original source

Read Full Article at CATO →