Cyber & Technology

Internet Voting is Too Insecure for Use in Elections

January 22, 2026 at 02:31Z
BIAS: Center
RELIABILITY: Low

Political Bias Rating

This rating indicates the source’s editorial stance on the political spectrum, based on analysis from Media Bias/Fact Check, AllSides, and Ad Fontes Media.

Far Left / Left: Progressive editorial perspective
Lean Left: Slightly progressive tendency
Center: Balanced, minimal editorial slant
Lean Right: Slightly conservative tendency
Right / Far Right: Conservative editorial perspective

Current source: Center. Stories with cross-spectrum coverage receive elevated prominence.

Reliability Rating

This rating measures the source’s factual accuracy, sourcing quality, and journalistic standards based on third-party fact-checking assessments.

Very High: Exceptional accuracy, rigorous sourcing
High: Strong factual reporting, minor issues rare
Mixed: Generally accurate but occasional concerns
Low: Frequent errors or misleading content
Very Low: Unreliable, significant factual issues

Current source: Low. Higher reliability sources receive elevated weighting in story prioritization.

Schneier on Security
12:05Z

No matter how many times we say it, the idea comes back again and again. Hopefully, this letter will hold back the tide for at least a while longer. Executive summary: Scientists have understood for many years that internet voting is insecure and that there is no known or foreseeable technology that can make it secure.

Still, vendors of internet voting keep claiming that, somehow, their new system is different, or the insecurity doesn’t matter. Bradley Tusk and his Mobile Voting Foundation keep touting internet voting to journalists and election administrators; this whole effort is misleading and dangerous. I am one of the many signatories.

Source Assessment

Political Bias
Center
Reliability
Low

Continue reading at the original source

Read Full Article at Schneier on Security →